Super-rich tax + tax-free threshold under $10,000
The Policy: Green Party Tax and Wealth Policy — June 2026 →
TL;DR
- The Greens want to make the first $10,000 anyone earns tax-free, and rework the income tax brackets so a new top rate of 45% applies to income over $160,000 (replacing today's 39% rate that starts at $180,000). The party says 96% of New Zealanders would pay less tax overall.
- To pay for this, they'd add a new 2.5% annual tax on net wealth above $10 million (the family home is exempt) — the party says 99.7% of people wouldn't pay it. Treasury and Inland Revenue costed this part at about $3.8 billion a year.
- They'd also add a 33% tax on gifts and inheritances over $1 million (excluding the family home, family farms, and Māori land), estimated to affect about 1,100 people a year, and raise company tax from 28% to 33% for large firms with turnover above $30 million.
- The Greens say the whole package raises about $5.15 billion in net new revenue in 2027/28, after they corrected an earlier $800 million costing error.
- This is an opposition policy, not law — it would only happen if the Greens won power and could get it through Parliament. Labour has already ruled out supporting a wealth or inheritance tax, so the policy's future depends on after-election negotiations, not the Greens alone.
- An independent economist called the costings "valid and reasonable" but said the many overlapping changes are hard to fully assess, and that how wealthy people might respond (for example, moving assets or leaving the country) wasn't fully modelled.
More detail
Supporters, including Green co-leaders Chlöe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson, frame this as a fair trade: ordinary earners get a tax cut, funded by taxing wealth concentrated at the very top. They point out this package is actually narrower than the Greens' 2023 plan, with the wealth-tax threshold raised from $2 million to $10 million.
Critics argue wealth taxes are difficult to design and administer in practice — a 2023 Treasury and IRD review of a similar idea was previously abandoned partly because valuing things like property, business assets, or shares that aren't easily sold ("illiquid assets") is genuinely hard, and there's a risk that wealthy people could restructure their assets or leave the country to avoid it. National and ACT have criticised the plan as economically damaging, while Labour has ruled out supporting a wealth or inheritance tax specifically.
Whether any of this becomes real policy depends heavily on what happens after the election: no single party can pass this alone, so it would need a coalition partner willing to back a wealth tax, which currently looks uncertain given Labour's position.
Full Detail if you want to know more
Pitched as a tax cut for the "96%" funded by the "super-rich", the Greens' 2026 plan would scrap income tax on the first dollars earned and tax large fortunes, big companies and inheritances to pay for it.
The Policy: Green Party Tax and Wealth Policy — June 2026 →
What it does:
- Creates a $10,000 tax-free threshold and rebuilds the income brackets, while adding a new 45% top rate on income over $160,000 (replacing the current 39% rate that starts at $180,000). The party says 96% of New Zealanders would pay less tax.
- Introduces a 2.5% annual wealth tax on net assets above $10 million (family home exempt), which the party says 99.7% of people would not pay. Treasury and Inland Revenue costed this part at about $3.8 billion a year (party estimate).
- Adds a 33% Capital Acquisitions (inheritance) tax on gifts and inheritances over $1 million, exempting the family home, family farms and Māori land; the party estimates it affects roughly 1,100 people a year.
- Lifts the company tax rate from 28% to 33% for firms with turnover above $30 million (the party says about 0.7% of companies), plus a 0.06% levy on the big four banks' liabilities and a 5% withholding tax on multinational tech profits, per the party's policy document.
- The party put net new revenue at about $5.15 billion in 2027/28, after correcting an $800m error over four years that co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick called a "typo".
The result: This is an opposition policy, not law — it would only take effect if the Greens won power and could legislate it, so for now it is a pledge. Co-leaders Chlöe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson frame it as answering a "cost of greed crisis", and the package is markedly narrower than the Greens' 2023 plan, lifting the wealth-tax threshold from $2m to $10m. Infometrics principal economist Brad Olsen said the costings are "valid and reasonable" but cautioned the overlapping changes are "difficult to fully assess" and behavioural effects were not fully modelled. Westpac chief economist Kelly Eckhold noted a capital gains style tax has become "relatively mainstream", while Deloitte tax partner Robyn Walker said wealth taxes "will not be popular" and are hard to design and administer. Opponents are blunt: National campaign chair Simeon Brown called it "economic lunacy" that would "drive away talent and capital", ACT leader David Seymour argued it rewards "tall poppy syndrome", and Labour leader Chris Hipkins said his party would not support a wealth or inheritance tax. (Tax is contested; positions here are attributed, not endorsed.)
The impacts to watch:
- Whether wealth can be valued and collected: 2023 Treasury/IRD advice on a wealth tax was abandoned as "not a simple tax", citing valuation of illiquid assets and capital-flight risk.
- Coalition maths: with Labour ruling out wealth and inheritance taxes, the policy's path depends on post-election negotiation, not the Greens alone.
- Behavioural response: how many high-net-worth individuals restructure assets or leave, which would erode the projected revenue Olsen flagged as uncertain.
- Big-tech and bank levies: enforceability of a 5% withholding tax on multinationals' offshore profits against existing double-tax treaties.
This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.
Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.
Key milestones
Greens unveil 'super-rich' tax and $10k tax-free threshold
The Green Party launched a tax package promising a $10,000 tax-free income threshold and tax cuts for what it says is 96% of New Zealanders, funded by a 2.5% wealth tax on net assets over $10m, a 33% inheritance tax over $1m, and higher company taxes. Co-leaders Chlöe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson framed it as a response to a "cost of greed crisis".
Greens detail the package: brackets, levies and exemptions
The party's policy document set out the full design: a new 45% top income rate over $160,000, a 2.5% wealth tax above $10m (family home exempt), a 33% capital acquisitions tax on inheritances and gifts over $1m (home, family farm and Māori land exempt), company tax up to 33% for firms turning over more than $30m, a 0.06% bank levy and a 5% withholding tax on multinational tech profits.
A narrower plan than 2023
Commentators noted the 2026 package is far smaller than the Greens' 2023 offering: the wealth-tax threshold rose from $2m to $10m and the corporate rate rise was confined to large firms, roughly halving the revenue the party had previously sought.
Greens correct $800m error, Swarbrick calls it a 'typo'
A day after launch the party corrected its costings, having added rather than subtracted $100m a year in IRD administration costs, trimming net revenue by about $800m over four years to roughly $5.15b in 2027/28. Co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick called it a "typo" and said the figures "still stack up".
Economists call costings reasonable but uncertain
Infometrics principal economist Brad Olsen said the estimates were "valid and reasonable" but warned the overlapping changes were "difficult to fully assess" and behavioural shifts were not fully modelled. Westpac's Kelly Eckhold said capital-gains-style taxes had become relatively mainstream, while Deloitte's Robyn Walker said wealth taxes are unpopular and hard to administer.
Where it stands ahead of the 2026 election
The policy remains a pledge that depends on the Greens winning power and assembling a majority to legislate it. Labour leader Chris Hipkins has ruled out backing a wealth or inheritance tax, and National and ACT oppose it outright, leaving its fate to post-election negotiation. Earlier Treasury and IRD work on a wealth tax was abandoned as "not a simple tax".
What people are saying
Sources
- RNZ — Greens propose wealth, corporate, inheritance taxes ↗
- Green Party — Tax the super-rich and large corporates, cut income tax for 96% ↗
- 1News — Greens propose wealth, inheritance taxes to fund income tax changes ↗
- 1News — Greens correct $800m tax policy error, Swarbrick calls it a 'typo' ↗
- NZ Herald — Greens' tax plan released online early, party reins in ambitions ↗
- NZ Herald — David Seymour attacks Green Party's new inheritance, income tax plan ↗
- BusinessDesk — Green tax plan taps anger over assets, wages and inequality ↗
- RNZ — Tax changes: What's been suggested so far? ↗
- The Spinoff — New Zealand tax changes: What's been suggested so far? ↗
