Replace the NCEA qualification

← All promises

NationalIn progress

● Education6 tracked updates

✦ AI Overview

The Policy: National Education Policy — September 2023 →

TL;DR

The government plans to scrap NCEA, New Zealand's main high school qualification, and replace it with new subject-based certificates: one at Year 12 (called the NZCE) and one at Year 13 (called the NZACE).
NCEA Level 1 would be dropped. Year 11 would instead become a "foundation year" with compulsory English, Maths and (from 2028) Science, plus a separate award checking students can read, write and do maths at a basic level.
Students would need to take at least five subjects a year and pass at least three to earn each certificate. The old "Not Achieved / Achieved / Merit / Excellence" system would be replaced by an A+ to E grading scale, and every subject would mix classwork with a final exam.
The government says NCEA is too flexible and confusing, and points to real problems: in 2024, 45% of students failed a new numeracy test, and about 13,500 Year 11 students missed out on NCEA Level 1.
This is still being built, not finished. The main structure was only confirmed in May 2026, and the new qualifications don't start until 2028-2030. The actual course content and exams haven't been written yet.
Teacher unions and some principals are worried. The PPTA president called the timeline "wildly optimistic" because teachers have no finished curriculum to teach from.

More detail

Supporters, including Education Minister Erica Stanford, say the current system is unclear and that a tougher, subject-based qualification would mean a school certificate finally means the same thing to every student, parent, employer and university.

Critics raise a few concerns. Some principals, especially from lower-income schools, worry that making Year 11 focus heavily on literacy and numeracy could set some students up to fail rather than letting them show their strengths. Teacher groups also warn the reforms hand the Education Minister more power over what schools teach, and that industry-focused subjects meant to help students into trades may not be ready in time.

Because the first students won't sit these new certificates until 2028 at the earliest, it's not yet possible to say whether the change will actually lift achievement or just relabel it. This is something to watch closely over the next few years.

Full Detail if you want to know more

Pitched as a clearer, more rigorous replacement for NCEA so that a school qualification finally means the same thing to every student, parent, employer and university.

The Policy: National Education Policy — September 2023 →

What it does:

Scraps NCEA entirely and replaces it with subject-based certificates: the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) at Year 12 and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) at Year 13.
Abolishes NCEA Level 1. Year 11 instead becomes a foundation year with compulsory English, Maths and (from 2028) Science, plus a Foundational Skills Award benchmarking literacy and numeracy.
Requires students to study at least five subjects a year and pass at least three to gain each certificate — a threshold relaxed from the original "pass four of five" after consultation.
Replaces the Not Achieved / Achieved / Merit / Excellence scale with a six-point A+ to E grading scale, with every subject mixing internal assessment and a final exam.
Sits on top of a new national curriculum for Years 9-13 meant to spell out what is taught, and when, to cut the inconsistency the government blames on NCEA's flexibility.

The result:

The case for change rests on real numbers: when the tougher literacy and numeracy co-requisite bit in 2024, 45% of students failed the numeracy test (55% passed), with reading at 70% and writing at 66%, and around 13,500 Year 11s missed a full NCEA Level 1 — over half of them holding the 60 credits but tripped up by the co-requisite. But this is a plan still being built, not a delivered result: the headline structure was only confirmed in May 2026, the new qualifications do not start until 2028-2030, and the curriculum and assessment materials are not yet written. Education Minister Erica Stanford says the aim is a system that is "clear, rigorous and widely understood"; critics say the design is unproven and the pace risky. PPTA president Chris Abercrombie called the timeline "wildly optimistic" given teachers have no finished curriculum to teach from, and Labour's Jan Tinetti, a former minister and principal, warned the direction "doesn't seem to be very forward-looking." Whether the new certificates actually raise achievement, or simply relabel it, cannot be judged until the first cohorts sit them.

The impacts to watch:

Equity: the Secondary Principals' Council's Steve McCracken warns a narrow Year 11 focus on literacy and numeracy could "condemn many students to failure" rather than letting them show strengths — and the profession itself split, with around 64 principals backing the reforms while about 90 from lower-income communities opposed them.
Teacher workload and autonomy: ten education bodies including NZEI and PPTA warned the wider reform package marks "a fundamental shift in professional autonomy," and the Education and Training (System Reform) Amendment Bill hands the minister expanded power over the curriculum.
Vocational pathways: industry-led subjects and Industry Skills Boards are central to the pitch but were only recently formed and still lack curriculum materials, raising doubts they will be ready for the rollout.

This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.

❓ Our Questions — you decide

Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.

Given the same numeracy and literacy gaps could still exist under a new name, should the government wait until the new courses and exams are fully written before scrapping NCEA?

Should a foundation year that focuses heavily on English and Maths be required for all Year 11 students, even those who might learn better by showing their strengths in other subjects?

Key milestones

Aug 2025official

Government unveils plan to scrap NCEA

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford announced NCEA would be replaced with two new subject-based qualifications — the New Zealand Certificate of Education at Year 12 and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education at Year 13 — alongside abolishing NCEA Level 1 and a new national curriculum for Years 9-13. Stanford argued NCEA's flexibility had encouraged students to focus on "simply attaining the qualification" rather than building skills. The proposal went out for public consultation closing 15 September 2025.

National Party — Replacing NCEA to transform secondary education ↗

Aug 2025news

Opposition and unions question the case for change

Early reaction was mixed. PPTA president Chris Abercrombie said NCEA had "undoubted benefits" and warned against "political flip flopping," urging stability. Labour's Willow-Jean Prime questioned whether the change was evidence-based and whether consultation time was adequate, while Green MP Lawrence Xu-Nan warned the plan risked "turning back the clock" with a one-size-fits-all approach. ACT, Universities NZ and business and hospitality groups broadly backed the direction.

1News — Government proposes axing NCEA, introducing new qualifications ↗

Nov 2025news

Reform bill introduced amid autonomy concerns

The Education and Training (System Reform) Amendment Bill was introduced to Parliament, expanding the minister's power over the curriculum, including creating alternative curriculum versions. Ten education organisations including NZEI Te Riu Roa and PPTA Te Wehengarua signed an open letter warning the wider reform package marked "a fundamental shift in professional autonomy and independence." The Spinoff reported the profession was split, with around 64 principals endorsing the changes and roughly 90 from lower-income communities opposing what they called "reform overload."

The Spinoff — A crash course in the many changes shaking up education ↗

Mar 2026news

Principals call the timeline "wildly optimistic"

As the government restated its plans, sector bodies remained sceptical. PPTA president Chris Abercrombie said he had expected analysis of the consultation but instead got "a repetition of an announcement made seven months ago," and called the timeline "wildly optimistic" because curriculum materials had not yet been written. Secondary Principals' Council chair Steve McCracken warned a narrow Year 11 focus on literacy and numeracy would "condemn many students to failure rather than enabling them to show their learning in ways that draw on their strengths."

RNZ — Union, principals body sceptical over NCEA replacement plans ↗

May 2026news

Final structure confirmed; pass threshold eased

In Orewa, Luxon and Stanford confirmed the design: students will study at least five subjects a year and need to pass a minimum of three to gain each certificate — eased from the original "pass four of five" — graded on a six-point A+ to E scale. English, Maths and Science become compulsory in Year 11 from 2028, with NZCE starting in 2029 and NZACE in 2030. Today's Year 9 students will be the first cohort affected. Stanford said the goal was qualifications that are "clear, rigorous and widely understood." The new certificates remain years from being sat, so their effect on achievement is still untested.

RNZ — Government confirms NCEA replacement details ↗

2026

Public reaction across platforms

Online reaction is sharply divided: many parents and employers welcome clearer A-to-E grades and a tougher qualification, while a large share of teachers, students and education commentators worry about the speed of change, unwritten curriculum materials and the impact on students who do not test well.

See the conversation:

Aggregated — individual posts are not cited.

Sources

Do you still agree with this promise? In the live site, your vote here feeds your weekly email digest and the party scorecards on the home page.