Restore Three Strikes sentencing
The Policy: National Real Consequences for Crime — 2023 Election →
TL;DR
- National has brought back the "Three Strikes" sentencing law. It gives tougher, automatic punishments to people who keep committing the most serious violent and sexual crimes.
- It works in three stages. A first serious conviction brings a formal warning. A second means the sentence is served with no chance of early release (no parole). A third brings the maximum, or near-maximum, sentence for that crime.
- The law covers 42 serious offences, including strangulation and suffocation, which were newly added. A crime only counts as a "strike" if the sentence is long enough (more than 12 months for a first strike, more than 24 months for a second), so minor cases are screened out.
- Judges keep one safety valve: if a full three-strikes sentence would be "manifestly unjust" in a particular case, they can step back from it.
- The law passed in December 2024 and came into force on 17 June 2025, so National has delivered what it promised.
- Whether it actually works is disputed. The Law Society says the evidence shows it does little to deter crime. Several legal and human-rights groups warned it would fall hardest on Māori and Pasifika. From the other side, much public feedback said it didn't go far enough.
More detail
Supporters say the law gives victims certainty that the worst repeat offenders will face serious consequences, and that removing early release for a second strike keeps dangerous people locked up for longer.
Critics, including the New Zealand Law Society, the Human Rights Commission and the Children's Commissioner, argue that automatic sentences stop judges weighing the specific circumstances of each case, that the evidence doesn't clearly show they reduce crime, and that they risk deepening existing gaps in the justice system for Māori and Pasifika. Because a version of this law existed before (from 2010 to 2022), warnings people received back then can be counted again under the new rules.
Full Detail if you want to know more
Pitched as restoring certainty for victims by guaranteeing tougher sentences for the worst repeat violent and sexual offenders — reversing Labour's 2022 repeal of the original 2010 law.
The Policy: National Real Consequences for Crime — 2023 Election →
What it does:
- How it works: a three-stage regime. A first qualifying conviction brings a formal warning; a second means the sentence is served without parole; a third brings the maximum (or near-maximum) term, with a 'manifest injustice' safety valve for judges. Warnings recorded under the old 2010–2022 law can be reactivated (Ministry of Justice).
- Scope: it covers 42 serious violent and sexual offences, including newly added strangulation and suffocation. To screen out minor cases, this version sets a higher bar than the 2010 law — a strike only counts where the sentence is more than 12 months (first strike) or more than 24 months (second) (Ministry of Justice news).
- Timeline: the Sentencing (Reinstating Three Strikes) Amendment Act passed in December 2024 and came into force on 17 June 2025 (1News).
The result:
National delivered it — the law is in force — so on its own terms the promise is kept. Whether it works is contested. The New Zealand Law Society submitted that the evidence shows minimal deterrent effect and that it is unlikely to reduce crime; the Children's Commissioner, Human Rights Commission, NZ Bar Association, Māori Law Society and Pacific Lawyers Association opposed it, warning it would fall disproportionately on Māori and Pasifika, ignore individual circumstances, and sit uneasily with the Bill of Rights, the Treaty and UN anti-torture guidance (NZ Law Society). From the other side, much of the public feedback — largely organised by the Sensible Sentencing Trust — argued it did not go far enough (RNZ). Verdict: a kept promise whose deterrent value is genuinely disputed, with warnings it may deepen existing inequities in the justice system.
This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.
Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.
Key milestones
Three Strikes reinstated
Parliament passed legislation reinstating a three-strikes sentencing regime.
Three Strikes takes effect
The reinstated regime came into force, applying to 42 serious violent and sexual offences, with no parole at a second strike and the maximum penalty at a third.
Critics call it ineffective
Labour, the Greens and the Criminal Bar Association argued the regime does little to cut reoffending and risks disproportionately affecting Māori.
Used sparingly so far
Reporting found the new regime was being applied rarely in its early months — far fewer strikes than its predecessor.
Public reaction across platforms
Sources
- National official policy page ↗
- Ministry of Justice — Three strikes law ↗
- Ministry of Justice — New three strikes laws take effect ↗
- 1News — Revived Three Strikes law takes effect (17 June 2025) ↗
- NZ Law Society — submission on the Three Strikes Bill ↗
- RNZ — feedback said three strikes did not go far enough ↗
- Three strikes law (overview) ↗
- PMN ↗
- NZ Herald ↗
